|
April 1997
Bird Protection Plan is
Working
PitWatch Issue Volume 2,
Number 1
In response to and following
the deaths of 342 snow geese in the Pit in November 1995, Montana
Resources' has devised and implemented a plan to deter birds
from landing in the Pit. The plan was recently granted official
approval by EPA and MDEQ. For about a year now, the company has
been using a combination of Phoenix Wailers (noise-making devices
that scare birds), rockets, spotlights, flares, and shell crackers
to shoo mainly geese and ducks away from the toxic water. When
necessary, mine workers also travel by boat into the Pit to scare
the birds. An estimated 4,000 birds were hazed away during 1996.
The Company will continue its
efforts each year during the spring and fall migration seasons.
October 1997
A Tale of Two Aquifers
PitWatch Issue Volume 2,
Number 2
Aquifers are places where water
is found in rocks and soils underground. The area around the
Berkeley Pit contains two main underground aquifers - the alluvial
aquifer and the bedrock aquifer.
The alluvial aquifer is closest
to the surface. Water flows freely through the layer of ground
called the alluvium, a porous mixture of sands, gravels, and
clays. Near the east wall of the Pit, the alluvium is saturated
with water from this aquifer.
The bedrock aquifer runs deep
below the ground. It's a "confined aquifer," trapped
within fractured bedrock which water cannot easily pass through.
In areas adjacent to historic mining activities, this aquifer
was dewatered by large pumps located underground to allow for
underground mining. The pumps were turned off in 1982, and since
then, the dewatered area has been filling back up again.
These two aquifers are independent
systems, separated by a thick layer of weathered bedrock that
hinders water from the alluvial aquifer from seeping down into
the bedrock aquifer. Instead, water from both aquifers is flowing
toward the Pit because it's the lowest spot in the area.
Monitoring wells installed
throughout the area are used to closely track the water levels
and the water quality of both aquifers. Since the monitoring
began, the alluvial aquifer has remained pretty much constant,
fluctuating only a few feet here and there depending on seasonal
precipitation. In contrast, the bedrock aquifer in areas of historic
dewatering has been steadily rising to restore itself to pre-mining
levels.
The monitoring wells also allow
the scientists to measure the pressure differential between the
two aquifers, expressed in pounds per square inch (psi). The
downward pressure of the alluvial aquifer is much greater than
the upward pressure of the bedrock aquifer. Even if the weathered
bedrock weren't there, the water migration would still be downward,
from the alluvium into the bedrock, because of this stronger
downward pressure (technically referred to as the downward gradient).
The downward gradient will keep the water confined within the
Berkeley Pit even when the water reaches the bedrock-alluvial
interface at about the 5,260-foot level. At that level, the two
aquifers will start to come in contact, but the force moving
the water will continue to be downward and toward the Pit.
The gradient would eventually reverse if the Pit water were to
exceed the 5,410-foot critical water level, but that will not
be allowed to happen. Remember, pumping and treatment of the
water must be well underway when the water in the Pitor
in any of the monitoring wellsapproaches the critical level.
If present trends continue, the Anselmo shaft (the one with the
highest current water level reading) will be the first and only
point to approach 5,410 feet.
Horseshoe
Bend Contigency Plan
Taking Shape
PitWatch Issue Volume 2,
Number 2
Right now, the Horseshoe Bend
diversion project is successful. It's diverting more water than
expected from the Pit, and Montana Resources (MR) has encountered
no problems with reusing a portion of the treated water at its
concentrator. The Horseshoe Bend Contingency Plan spells out
various options for handling the flow (3.8 million gallons per
day) in the event that 'business as usual' has to stopdue
to suspended mining operations, for example.
If the stoppage is for six months or less, MR and ARCO will be
allowed to let the water once again flow into the Pit. If long-term
problems are encountered, they will be required to find another
way to treat the water. Options explored in the contingency plan
include building a new treatment plant, converting the concentrator
into a treatment plant, or using the Yankee Doodle Tailings Pond
as a treatment facility. We'll continue to update you on the
contingency plan as it is further developed.
Meet
Our Science Fair Winners
PitWatch Issue Volume 2,
Number 2
The Committee awarded $50 savings
bonds to each of these students. Their science fair projects
all explored important topics related to the Berkeley Pit. Congratulations,
and keep up the good work! In fact, the Committee intends to
offer awards again at the 1998 Science Fair, and students are
encouraged to choose projects related to the Pit for next year's
competition.
 |
Joe Metesh
4th grade, Kennedy Elementary
What Makes Acid in the Berkeley Pit? |
 |
Becky Patton
5th grade, Longfellow Elementary
Can You Cleanse Polluted Water by Boiling or Freezing? |
 |
Jamie Rozan
6th grade, Longfellow Elementary
Taking Minerals out of Pit Water |
 |
Alec Macgregor
7th grade, East Middle School
The Effects of Lime Addition into the Warm Springs Ponds Systems |
 |
Brian Wheeler
8th grade, Ramsay School
Remediation of Berkeley Pit Water using Chemical Adjustment
of pH Levels |
|